We've moved to a new site!

Join us at publicservices.international - for all the latest news, resources and struggles from around the world.

We are no longer updating world-psi.org and it will be progressively phased out: all content will be migrated to the new site and old links will redirect eventually.

"RCEP, labour & public services" workshop (Philippines)

6 September, 2017 to 7 September, 2017
09.30 - 17.30
Manila, Philippines
Event type: 
Public Services International, Focus on the Global South, Indonesia for Global Justice (IGJ), NAGKAISA Labor Coalition and Transnational Institute (TNI) organised a two-day regional workshop “RCEP, LABOUR & PUBLIC SERVICES” that aimed to demystify the RCEP and trade agreements from the viewpoint of public services and implications for workers. The workshop took place on 6-7 September in Manila, Philippines.

The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) is currently the biggest and most ambitious mega Free Trade Agreement (FTA) being negotiated. Its members include 16 countries in the Asia Pacific region (ASEAN plus China, Japan, New Zealand, Australia, India and South Korea) encompassing 50% of the world’s population and 40% of the worlds GDP. Its twenty three trade chapters aim to go beyond current WTO and FTA commitments of member countries on issues ranging from agricultural commodities, manufactured goods, services, intellectual property, foreign investment, government procurement and the digital economy.

Since negotiations were launched early 2013, public interest groups including trade unions and social movements have consistently questioned whether the RCEP is in the public interest. Impacts on farm livelihoods, job losses in manufacturing, undermining public services, curtailing of democratic policy space, deregulating rules around FDI, decreased government revenues due to removal of import tariffs and higher costs of essential medicines due to restricted intellectual property (IP) rules rank among the issues they have raised with negotiators, elected representatives and media. Further, despite nineteen trade rounds (as of August 2017), there is a cloud of secrecy over the texts with no legislative scrutiny at the national or sub-national level in RCEP member countries.

Among the key concerns is how the RCEP, by facilitating trade in services, will undermine access to public services, entrench privatisation and hinder the creation of decent jobs. Given the failures of two decades of privatisation, especially in public services, there is now an evident trend (especially at the municipal level) to take back services into public hands. RCEP clauses can make it impossible for citizens, unions and governments (at any level) to reverse privatisation. Rather, RCEP commitments will force governments to either maintain current levels of privatisation or go further down the path of de-regulation. Prohibiting contractual employment and ensuring decent wages can also fall foul of RCEP clauses. If countries decide to do otherwise, the investment chapter in RCEP will allow affected Transnational Corporations (TNCs) to sue Governments in secret international arbitration tribunals.

Draft schedule

Also see